—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
Hash: SHA1
Landau: Massacres Go with War
Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn’t Fit
Progreso Weekly – Jun 15, 2006
http://www.progresoweekly.com/index.php?progreso=Landau&otherweek=115…
Massacres Go with War
By Saul Landau
"I can’t help wondering today how many of the innocents slaughtered in
Haditha took the opportunity to vote in the Iraqi elections – before their
`liberators’ murdered them." -Robert Fisk, Seattle Post Intelligencer, June
4, 2006
"Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a
mistake when you make it again." -F. P. Jones
The U.S. government has established a world wide reputation as a slow
learner. In March, several Vietnamese in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City
remarked how little wisdom Washington had absorbed from its decade
plus experience trying to "liberate" Vietnam. Dozens of Vietnamese
offered the same observation. "You are making the same mistakes in
Iraq that you made here."
In the 1960s and early 1970s, the nightly news showed GIs loading body
bags into helicopters. Regular TV and newspaper images of wounded GIs
appeared, alongside portraits of others in anguish, who might have
posed for Edvard Munch’s "Silent Scream." We saw less of the 3 million
Vietnamese who died along with the 58 thousand plus Americans. Later,
we saw how the vets brought the war home with them, some with visible
wounds; others with deep scars on their psyches. The VA estimates that
nearly 200,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. And more than
half a million experience homelessness over the course of a year.
(National Coalition for Homeless Veterans www.nchv.org/background.cfm)
On December 7, 2004, UPI reported that already "U.S. veterans from the
war in Iraq are beginning to show up at homeless shelters around the
country, and advocates fear they are the leading edge of a new
generation of homeless vets not seen since the Vietnam era."
How do young soldiers cope with the basic fact of war? Killing the
enemy always includes civilian women, children and old people. How
many Iraq War veterans will have nightmares for decades, end up
hopeless and then homeless? Or, will some gun their families or just
wander off into oblivion, as so many Vietnam vets did?
Does the "fog of war" explain atrocities? Does it also cloud the
public mind? War makers lie to get public support – not hard after the
9/11 shock. They mask their real "reasons" for going to war with
frightening images of Iraq as a threat to security with her weapons of
mass destruction and links to Al Qaeda. Afghanistan harbored
terrorists.
The United States then launches war to "liberate" and spread freedom,
democracy and decency. Our fighting men and women learn – on paper –
the proper rules of engagement (ROE) and only target enemy positions,
not civilians.
Naturally, the media and public express shock when its face gets
pushed into reports of systematic torture, for example at Abu Ghraib
and other military prisons in 2003. Then, reports surface of killings
and use of illegal weapons in Falluja and now a November 2005 Haditha
massacre. U.S. marines apparently dispatched 24 or more Iraqi
civilians and covered up the foul deeds. The media compared these with
the extermination of My Lai villagers in Vietnam in 1968.
Ironically, the media doesn’t report on the victims of aerial
bombardment during "shock and awe" and subsequent bombing campaigns;
nor does it offer readers information of other "collateral damage,"
considered inside the correct rules of engagement. In short, war is
hell on civilians and soldiers – a thought that is not headlined when
presidents rev up war sentiment.
On June 2, BBC reported it had uncovered evidence of yet another
incident that shows "U.S. forces may have been responsible for the
deliberate killing of 11 innocent Iraqi civilians." BBC reporters
cautiously aver that a video "appears to challenge the U.S. military’s
account of events that took place in the town of Ishaqi," 60 miles
north of Baghdad.
The U.S. said at the time four people died during a military operation
in Ishaqi, but Iraqi police claimed that U.S. troops had deliberately
shot the 11 people. An early Pentagon report justified the March 15
killings. On June 2, Major-General William Caldwell called "absolutely
false" charges that "troops executed a family living in this safe
house, and then hid the alleged crimes by directing an air strike."
The Pentagon rejected the video "evidence" and said that its military
investigation had cleared all troops involved of misconduct.
Pentagon officials did admit, however, that at Ishaqi "an AC-130
gunship – an aircraft that pummels its target with side-firing guns –
had been involved in the assault."
The June 3 London Times reported that "the U.S. military account in
March said that as U.S.-led forces approached the house of a suspected
al-Qaeda operative, they came under fire. The troops called in an air
strike and the building was destroyed, with an insurgent, two women
and a child killed." (Tim Reid in Washington and Ned Parker in
Baghdad) Apparently, a tip had come to the military that an Al Qaeda
operative had visited the house.
The Ishaqi video shows five dead children, "four of whom appeared to
have bullet wounds to the head. Local Iraqi police officials said that
the U.S. troops kept an entire unarmed family handcuffed in a room for
an hour, before spraying them with bullets. They then blew up the
building." The Pentagon claims the building collapsed under heavy
fire, killing one suspect, two women and a child. BBC said its video
appeared genuine, even though a Sunni group taped it. The video
demonstrates what BBC world affairs editor John Simpson called several
dead people with "gunshot wounds."
Brigadier-General Donald Campbell, Chief of Staff of coalition forces
in Iraq, was asked why these alleged incidents were occurring. He
replied: "When you’re in a combat theatre dealing with enemy
combatants who don’t abide by the law of war [sic !!!], who do acts of
indecency, soldiers become stressed; they become fearful."
Duh! That’s what war produces! Occupied people get pissed off. First,
under legal ROE, the air force or navy can drop a huge bomb or fire a
missile at an enemy target. In Gulf War I, one such block buster bomb
hit an air raid shelter and killed almost 450 civilians, mostly women
and young children. The Pentagon later discovered its mistake and sent
an apology. "Too late," an Iraqi woman told me when I asked her how
she felt about the apology.
Under rather dubious ROE, U.S. bombers dropped nuclear weapons on
civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, burned German and Japanese by the
hundreds of thousands by firebombing cities like Dresden and Tokyo.
In Korea and Vietnam, almost 6 million civilians perished from U.S.
ordinance. After thee plus years of mounting bloodshed, Iraqis may
look with jaded eyes on the US military’s promise to prevent further
Hadithas by forcing coalition troops in Iraq to undergo 30 days of
sensitivity training; exposure to "core warrior values," according to
a Pentagon statement.
The November Haditha slaughter may become a signpost for the U.S.
occupation of Iraq as My Lai was for Vietnam. Iraqis appear to have
had enough "liberation." The Haditha mayor declared the massacre "a
day of human catastrophe" and accused the Americans of "war crimes."
Even the pro U.S. prime minister, Nuri al-Maliki, declared that "We
will ask for answers not only about Haditha but about any operation
.. in which killing happened by mistake and we will hold those who
did it responsible."
The Haditha and Ishaqi incidents apparently abound, although the media
coverage has underplayed such atrocities. Stories usually refer to the
number of "insurgents" killed – just as they did in Viet Nam, when the
"gooks" had other names.
War means atrocities and the longer occupations prevail, the more
horrible acts the depressed and frustrated occupiers will commit. The
war makers lie and manipulate the public into believing a crisis
exists, send troops abroad and then deal with generations of
consequences – here and there – that ensue.
I await a declaration from leading Democrats Hillary Clinton, Joe
Biden and Mark Warner, as examples, that they will show skepticism
before repeating the history of folly. I fear that because they accept
the imperial axiom, they will continue to mislead the populace into
thinking Democrats will actually change decades of aggressive policy.
They apparently have learned as much as Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld from
My Lai and Haditha. They keep talking in "strong defense" clichés, as
if the Pentagon’s useless high tech weapons could somehow defend us
against another 9/11.
Politicians keep saying "support our troops." Do they mean bring them
home or get more of them killed? If U.S. forces remain in Iraq,
despite increased "ethical training," more massacres will likely
result. Perhaps this thought will provoke a measure of political
courage!
[Landau is an Institute for Policy Studies Fellow]
*
================================================================
NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems
Since 1985 – Information for the Rest of Us
Search Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/htdig/search.html
List Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/
Subscribe: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr
================================================================
—–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—–
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEkijuHwEfpL2U00kRAp59AKCEVRZEFDC6B4RZdRQP39OH8C6euACbBAGZ
AMDaxALoSZvFLceaU9Bjp4M=
=ATBM
—–END PGP SIGNATURE—–
–
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com